Second Nature, by 29Court
29Court is the consigliere for your AI staff. It takes care of things, keeps the riff-raff out, and learns exactly how you want things done. We run your rules live, and then we bake them into your own fine-tuned model, so behaving your way stops being an instruction and becomes its second nature.
One standard of conduct, delivered twice, because each way does the half the other cannot. The rules keep your bot safe tonight. The fine-tuning is how you stop having to supervise it.
Your bot goes to Cotillion. Every correction you make, in ordinary conversation, becomes a rule on your own rules page: visible, editable, yours. The rules are enforced in code before work reaches you and after it comes back. Not remembered. Not vibes. Enforced, on any assistant you use, including the one you already have.
When your corrections pile up, we render them into lessons, before and after side by side, and fine-tune your own model with them. The result is a LoRA: a small set of weights fitted to one wearer, encoding your defaults, your voice, your judgment about what happens first and what never happens unprompted. Served only behind your private key. Yours alone.
Pick a complaint. On the left, what an untrained bot does with it. On the right, the same bot after its fitting.
A demonstration, with invented examples. The mechanism is the product: a correction goes in, and behavior comes out.
Five steps, and your only job is the first one.
In ordinary conversation, the way you already do. Shorter. Never on a Friday. The link goes on its own line. That is the entire job, and the pickier you are, the better it works.
Your Correction Ledger holds each one in your own words, readable by you at any time. Every entry is already a rule your bot obeys tonight.
Behind the scenes, each correction becomes a lesson with the before and the after side by side. If two of your corrections disagree, they come back to you exactly once, as one decision. Never as homework.
The lessons train your private LoRA. Then it sits an exam: your own corrections, held back from training, that it has never seen. If the fitted bot does not land closer to your judgment than the untrained one, it does not ship.
Plain words, no jargon: how much closer your bot lands to your standards than it did before the fitting, graded on your own corrections. The report is the proof. There is no other kind.
Only you can tell your staff exactly how you want things. Every other AI product treats an exacting boss as a cost. Here, exacting is the input. Each correction does three jobs at once: it fixes tonight's work, it sharpens every future draft, and it raises the standard on the next exam. The client who corrects most ends up with measurably the best bot, and can watch the measurement. Difficult to please is the whole point.
Tickets, reservations, the car at the curb. Settled and sorted, in your calendar, with the details already fussed over.
The follow-ups get chased, the drafts get checked against your rules, the small print gets read. Fussing is the staff's job description.
What reaches you is a decision, not a project: approve, defer, comment. Casual decisions, made like the boss you are. This is what AI is all about.
Does this replace the assistant I already use?
No. The rules run on the assistant you have, tonight, whichever one it is. The fine-tuned model serves your own bots and staff surfaces through your private key. Most clients keep their favorite assistant and add both layers underneath it.
What do you actually need from me?
Corrections. The ones you already give, in your own words, as they occur to you. A short sitting now and then to settle any that contradict each other. Nothing else: no forms about your preferences, no homework.
How is this different from a settings page or a long prompt?
A prompt is a request a model can drift away from. Rules here are enforced in code, and a fitted model does not drift from its defaults, because the defaults are in its weights. The exam on your own held-back corrections is how we prove it, in writing, every fitting.
Tell us one thing your bot keeps getting wrong. That sentence is the first entry in your Correction Ledger, and the conversation starts there.
Your correction is with us, and the reply will come back in writing to your email.